<data>
<row _id="1"><Sr. No>1</Sr. No><Frameworks>Revised Blooms Taxonomy

(Used to analyse Type of Questions)</Frameworks><Indicators /><CODE /><Description>Bloom’s Taxonomy is a classification of the different objectives and skills that educators set for their students (learning objectives)
This taxonomy had permeated teaching and instructional planning for almost 50 years before it was revised in 2001.
It's a model that classifies different levels of human cognition of thinking, learning and understanding.
</Description></row>
<row _id="2"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Remembering</Indicators><CODE>A1</CODE><Description>Retrieving relevant knowledge from long-term memory.
</Description></row>
<row _id="3"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Understanding</Indicators><CODE>A2</CODE><Description>Determining the meaning of instructional messages, including oral, written, and graphic communication.
</Description></row>
<row _id="4"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Applying</Indicators><CODE>A3</CODE><Description>Carrying out or using a procedure in a given situation
</Description></row>
<row _id="5"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Analysing</Indicators><CODE>A4</CODE><Description>Breaking material into its constituent parts and detecting how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose
</Description></row>
<row _id="6"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Evaluating</Indicators><CODE>A5</CODE><Description>Making judgments based on criteria and standards
</Description></row>
<row _id="7"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Creating</Indicators><CODE>A6</CODE><Description>Putting elements together to form a novel, coherent whole or make an original product.
</Description></row>
<row _id="8"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators /><CODE /><Description /></row>
<row _id="9"><Sr. No>2</Sr. No><Frameworks>Lee Shulman
(Used to analyse Type of Knowledge)</Frameworks><Indicators /><CODE /><Description>Lee Shulman and his fellow researchers looked to better understand the source of teachers' comprehension of their subject areas, how that knowledge grows, and how teachers understand and react to curriculum, reshaping it into something their students will understand.
</Description></row>
<row _id="10"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Content/Subject Knowledge</Indicators><CODE>B1</CODE><Description>This refers to the amount and organization of subject knowledge in the mind of the teacher
Why a given topic is particularly central to a discipline whereas another may be somewhat peripheral
</Description></row>
<row _id="11"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Pedagogical Knowledge</Indicators><CODE>B2</CODE><Description>Knowledge that goes beyond subject matter to the dimension of teaching particular form of content knowledge that encompasses the aspects of content most related to its teachability
</Description></row>
<row _id="12"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</Indicators><CODE>B3</CODE><Description>Pedagogical content knowledge includes an understanding of what makes the learning of specific topics easy or difficult
Of knowledge about the misconceptions of students and about the instructional conditions necessary to overcome and transform those initial conceptions
</Description></row>
<row _id="13"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Curricular Knowledge</Indicators><CODE>B4</CODE><Description>Expect that the teacher possesses understandings about the curricular alternatives available for instructions
Underlies the teacher's ability to relate the content of a given course or lesson to topics or issues being discussed simultaneously in other classes
</Description></row>
<row _id="14"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators /><CODE /><Description /></row>
<row _id="15"><Sr. No>3</Sr. No><Frameworks>NCFTE

(Used to analyse Type of Knowledge)</Frameworks><Indicators /><CODE /><Description>Transaction of the curriculum and evaluating the developing teacher to determine the extent to which the ideas conceptualized are put into practice
The framework takes a clear approach in suggesting the design of pedagogy courses within the frame of languages, mathematics, sciences and social sciences rather than in terms of school subjects.
</Description></row>
<row _id="16"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Childhood, Child and Adolescent Development and Learning
(Child Development and Learning Knowledge)
</Indicators><CODE>B5</CODE><Description>Constructs of childhood, adolescence; socialization; language; cognition, thinking and learning; school and physical health; self, identity</Description></row>
<row _id="17"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Inclusivity Knowledge
</Indicators><CODE>B6</CODE><Description>All children in the same classrooms, in the same schools receive equal real learning opportunities even groups who have traditionally been excluded – not only children with disabilities, but speakers of minority languages too.
</Description></row>
<row _id="18"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Gender, School and Society
(Socio-Cultural Knowledge)
</Indicators><CODE>B7</CODE><Description>Identity development; understanding curriculum and texts from a gender lens; debates about professionalism and feminization of the teaching profession</Description></row>
<row _id="19"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Teacher &amp; Learner in Society
(Systemic Knowledge)
</Indicators><CODE>B8</CODE><Description>Issues and concerns of contemporary Indian society; human and child rights; classroom as social context</Description></row>
<row _id="20"><Sr. No xsi:nil="true" /><Frameworks /><Indicators>Assessment and Evaluation Studies
(Assessment Knowledge)
</Indicators><CODE>B9</CODE><Description>Draw upon critical reading of psychometric approaches; sociological frames of analysis and constructive approaches</Description></row>
</data>
